- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:58:07 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10619 --- Comment #3 from Shelley Powers <shelleyp@burningbird.net> 2010-09-13 16:58:06 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > This isn't a W3C document, is it? This isn't part of the HTML WG effort, > > either, is it? > > As a co-chair, I will state that the WHATWG has permission to use the W3C > hosted bugzilla for this purpose. How then is a person supposed to know when a work is officially sanctioned as an HTML WG work, and when a work does not have this official sanctioning? Just saying the component is "other" doesn't change the fact that it is listed as a product of the HTML WG. In particular, linking it to an external document just adds to the confusion. Is this a product of the HTML WG, or not? It shows up in queries as one. It shows in the front page of the HTML WG as a new bug that hasn't been resolved. I would assume if the W3C is generously sharing its bug facility with other organizations, they would at least do so in such a way that there is no assumption that this bug is part of an official work within the W3C. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 16:58:08 UTC