- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 21:29:05 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10481 --- Comment #43 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2010-09-11 21:29:04 --- (In reply to comment #31) > In MSAA at least if an > <img> has an alt="" its role is graphic and its name="" > <img> has no alt its role is graphic and its name=none[false] > <img> has an alt="text" its role is graphic and its name="text" > > so MSAA provides a differentiation between them Here are the results from WebKit, according to Accessibility Inspector in Mac OS X 10.5: <img> has alt="<the empty string>" its role=AXWebarea, its AXRoleDescription=HTML content <img> has no alt its role=AXimage, its AXRoleDescription=Image <img> has alt="<space or text>" its role=AXimage, AXRoleDescription=Image So Webkit looks consequently at the @alt: if the @alt contains if only space character, then the <img> is considered an image. But if the content is the empty string, then the users doesn't get any info whatsoever about the presence of the iamge - it is conflated with the page. Steve, when you said alt="text", did you include alt="<space>" ? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 11 September 2010 21:29:07 UTC