W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > September 2010

[BUGS] Minutes Bug triage sub-team 7 September 2010

From: Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:24:14 -0400
Message-ID: <4C86672E.1060104@w3.org>
To: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Minutes of the 7 September 2010 Bug triage sub-team meeting are posted
to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/07-a11y-bugs-minutes.html and copied below.

  Bug Triage sub-team - HTML A11Y TF

    07 Sep 2010


See also: IRC log <http://www.w3.org/2010/09/07-a11y-bugs-irc>


    kliehm, Michael_Cooper
    Laura_Carlson, Joshue_O'Connor, Marco_Ranon


    * Topics <http://www.w3.org/2010/09/07-a11y-bugs-minutes.html#agenda>
         1. Select a lead
         2. Modus Operandi
         3. New bugs
         4. Homework assignments from last week
    * Summary of Action Items


      Select a lead

Only two people on call, postponing until more of us here

      Modus Operandi

going through "wontfix" bugs

need to verify "fixed" bugs

and look at new bugs

<scribe> -> New a11y bugs in last 2 weeks:

<scribe> -> New bug snapshots

We need to catch up on Laura's snapshots, they have new bugs going back
to April 2010

once we catch up, she doesn't need to do snapshots, the bugzilla query
above will find all new a11y bugs in the past 2 weeks

Laura just needs to tag a11y as appropriate

also need to look at needsinfo

Let's assign 10 new bugs each to decide if a11ytf priority next week

next week, we should start on needsinfo bugs, assign a few each as
homework to complete

      New bugs

Starting with

filtering out ones already a TF priority

Martin to take 9473, 9474, 9876, 10168, 10450, 10451

Marco to take 10455 10562 10463 10464 10465 10467

Josh to take 10478 10481 10482 10484 10485 10486

Michael to take 10489, 10493, 10494, 10496 10497 10518 10525

determine if these should be a a11ytf bug

(some may have already had that status rejected)

suggest additional work to kickstart activity if possible, e.g., to whom
to assign it, any additional info might be needed, etc.

      Homework assignments from last week

skipping reviews from Michael and Martin because we don't have any third
POV available on those

reviewing Josh's because we're 2nd & 3rd POV

== 9473 ==


this has been escalated to Tracker, there's a call for objection survey
on the change proposal

note: Josh reviewed 9212 instead of 9871, so 9871 is still unreviewed

== 9212 ==

not consensus, partly because not sure we understand this, postponing
until Josh back to present his view

== 9216 ==

We reopened as part of a prior triage

<scribe> scribe: MichaelC

    Summary of Action Items

[End of minutes]
Minutes formatted by David Booth's scribe.perl
version 1.135 (CVS log <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2002/scribe/>)
$Date: 2010/09/07 16:18:50 $


Michael Cooper
Web Accessibility Specialist
World Wide Web Consortium, Web Accessibility Initiative
E-mail cooper@w3.org <mailto:cooper@w3.org>
Information Page <http://www.w3.org/People/cooper/>
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 16:24:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:44 UTC