W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > November 2010

[Bug 11279] the "assigned access key" section doesn't seem to know if it's a definition or a requirement. Should probably be rephrased to more correctly use RFC2119.

From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:09:41 +0000
To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
Message-Id: <E1PKwNB-0007JP-2K@jessica.w3.org>

Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|public-html-a11y@w3.org     |cooper@w3.org

--- Comment #1 from Michael Cooper <cooper@w3.org> 2010-11-23 17:09:40 UTC ---
Bug triage sub-team doesn't think this is a A11Y TF priority. It's not an HTML
feature, just a spec clarity issue. Our understanding is there is a specific
reason for the phrasing approach, and doesn't need task force involvement.

Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 23 November 2010 17:09:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:47 UTC