- From: Masatomo Kobayashi <MSTM@jp.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 06:50:58 +0900
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Hironobu Takagi <TAKAGIH@jp.ibm.com>, public-html-a11y@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF15E3642E.1FED6656-ON4925772F.006A325D-4925772F.00780AB2@jp.ibm.com>
Hi Silvia, Thank you for considering my input. Generally it looks fine as it is, being consistent with our experience. The requirements regarding TTS overflowing might be able to be partly introduced in the section 2.1 because it occurs just depending on client-side TTS settings, and 'extending' is not the only means to address it as mentioned in EAD-6. It would affect video creation in a different way from intentionally-extended AD (traditional EAD), which would still be extended in human-narrated AD. Though I am not sure which the best place to put them in is, EAD-5 and 6 seems not a specific requirement to EAD. Also, the last item in the paragraph regarding textual EAD (i.e., A visually- complicated scene...) might not fit in this place because actually it is a traditional reason of EAD. Regards, Masatomo Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote on 2010/05/26 16:58:30: > Hi Masatomo, > > I have just added an extended set of requirements to the "extended > audio descriptions" requirements collection that this group has > started on the wiki, see > http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/ > Media_Accessibility_Requirements#Extended_audio_description > . > > I would value your input into that requirements list. > > Thanks, > Silvia. > > > On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 2:37 AM, Masatomo Kobayashi <MSTM@jp.ibm.com> wrote: > > My comments on extended captions and Speech CSS are inline below. > > > > Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote on 2010/05/05 09:11:08: > > > >> Thinking about it in more depth, we may even want to use such an > >> attribute on captions and subtitles. It would indicate what will > >> happen if caption elements overlap into the next caption text cue, ie. > >> just display both (which would be the default) or clip the cue. > >> Pausing the video probably doesn't make sense for caption text. > > > > Oops, I have never deeply thought about captions. > > I agree that we could use that attribute to handle overlapping captions. > > > > I think "extended caption" in Geoff's comment is also interesting. > > In contrast to extended audio descriptions, a boolean flag will be needed > > for each "extended" caption element? > > The duration of a caption must be explicitly specified by the author (so we > > cannot set the same begin/end time to indicate it is "extended") while that > > of an audio description is actually determined by the TTS engine. > > > >> That would be one way to support it. Do you know if Web browsers > >> support SSML natively? > >> > >> Also, there is Speech CSS (see http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-speech/), > >> which seems to provide for the same functionality. Have you > >> experimented with Speech CSS? Do you know if TTS engines support it? > > > > According to documents, Opera supports Speech CSS and a small part of SSML. > > Also Fire Vox provides support for Speech CSS. > > But unfortunately they did not work well on my PC, so I have not actually > > used those features. > > > > If Seeech CSS is chosen, the problem will be with which format (instead of > > srt) to use to mark up the external text resource to be described by the > > CSS. > > > > We might need to check SSML/Speech CSS features of Web browsers, screen > > readers, and TTS engines to explore the possibility of rich textual audio > > descriptions. > > > > Regards, > > Masatomo > >
Received on Wednesday, 26 May 2010 21:51:46 UTC