- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 May 2010 21:04:24 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9673 Summary: Remove any reference to a specific Time Stamp format for video captioning from the specification at this time Product: HTML WG Version: unspecified Platform: PC URL: http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/video.html#websrt OS/Version: Windows NT Status: NEW Keywords: a11y, a11ytf, media, outOfScope Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) AssignedTo: ian@hixie.ch ReportedBy: jfoliot@stanford.edu QAContact: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org CC: mike@w3.org, public-html@w3.org, public-html-a11y@w3.org The specification of a newly minted Time-Stamp format (WebSRT) within the HTML5 Specification is inappropriate and premature at this time. Even though the HTML5 Accessibility Task Force (HTML-A11Y TF) are still gathering requirements, it's already clear the direction in the editor's draft is inadequate. Specifically, this text should NOT be present in the next heartbeat spec release. * This is a newly proposed file format that is not yet fully specified, is untested, has zero implementation history, zero authoring tools and has not been proposed by any known or documented W3C Process. * It has not been proven that the newly minted WebSRT format addresses all known accessibility issues - the needs analysis and requirements document is unknown and/or undocumented. Affected communities (both end users, as well as content creators) have not been adequately canvassed to ensure that their needs are being met. * It is likely that creating and defining a new Time Stamp format is out of scope for the HTML WG: in this way it is very similar to the introduction of Microdata (which has spun out to the HTML Microdata Draft) and RDFa (which has spun off to the HTML + RDFa Draft) * The HTML-A11Y TF were not consulted on this topic; they are currently tasked with, and working on, specific recommendations related to one or more Time Stamp formats. The Task Force was recently surveyed on which time-stamp formats should be considered (http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/media-text-format/results), at which time WebSRT neither existed nor was proposed or suggested. * Premature spec language exacerbates HTML-A11Y TF's ability to work expeditiously toward an HTML5 last call. It introduces tangents and levels of confusion that work against a timely completion of a last call document. * The continuing active work on this topic in the Media Subteam of the HTML-A11Y TF is well known to the HTML-WG. To move forward on spec language without TF input contravenes the consensus policy of the W3C. Also relates to: * Issue-9 (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9) -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Thursday, 6 May 2010 21:04:27 UTC