- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 15:56:03 -0700
- To: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Cc: 'Silvia Pfeiffer' <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, "'Gregory J. Rosmaita'" <oedipus@hicom.net>, public-html-a11y@w3.org
On Mar 17, 2010, at 1:58 PM, John Foliot wrote: > Silvia Pfeiffer >> >> Is there no way at all to transfer a CAPTCHA onto a braille device? >> >> Just curious. > > Hi Silvia, > > No, as it then would also be accessible to bots, etc. The whole > point is > that CAPTCHAs (visual or audio) are actually testing for physical > ability > rather than cognition - you can see something or hear something, > actions > that machines can replicate but not accurately process - thus, the > logic > goes, you are human and not machine. What it's really asking for is cognition that only a human is believed capable of (including interpretation of visual or audio stimuli). Some captcha-like gates I have seen ask a topical question in plain english. I am not sure if these are as effective as the traditional kind. > > But if a disabled user requires a machine to interact with technology > (i.e. Adaptive Technology), then the very task that CAPTCHAs have been > created to do (frustrate machine processing) impacts the user > *reliant* on > machine processing. (And we won't get into the whole issue of some > people's belief in OCR to save the world, or speech-to-text for > captioning, because if these technologies did actually work with 100% > accuracy, they would completely negate the 'security' around CAPTCHAs) Actually, the reason CAPTCHAs are so ridiculous is because the state of the art on OCR is so good. It's very hard to make something that a human can read but a machine can't. CAPTCHAs that are currently in use are barely legible even to people of normal vision. Regards, Maciej
Received on Wednesday, 17 March 2010 22:56:37 UTC