- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:29:07 +1100
- To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>, public-html-a11y@w3.org
Excellent - looking forward to it! Sorry I misread. Regards, Silvia. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:24 AM, Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote: > hi sylvia, > as i said in my reply to maciej a few hours ago, and also in the last a11y > taskforce meeting, i will write the change proposal. > > regards > stevef > > On 16 March 2010 10:57, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> > >> > On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:16 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> On Mar 15, 2010, at 9:32 PM, Michael(tm) Smith wrote: >> >> >> >>> During last Thursday's a11y task-force telcon, we made the >> >>> following resolution and agreed to announce it on this mailing >> >>> list and to give an opportunity to any members of the task force >> >>> who not on the telcon to express any disagreements they might have >> >>> with the resolution. >> >>> >> >>> RESOLUTION: The a11y TF resolves that the canvas navsubtree >> >>> proposal is ready for wider review by the HTML WG, with the >> >>> understanding that the a11y TF supports it and that related >> >>> proposals needed to fully resolve the issue are still under >> >>> discussion and will be brought to the HTML WG later. >> >>> >> >>> If you have any comments on that resolution, please send them by >> >>> e-mail to this list prior to the a11y task-force telcon this >> >>> Thursday. >> >> >> >> I'd still like an answer to my question about the earlier version of >> >> this >> >> proposal (where it was called "adom"): >> >> >> >> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Feb/0507.html >> >> >> >> I asked this on Feb 23, and I never got a response, nor do I recall >> >> this >> >> question being answered in the course of the discussions at that time. >> > >> > Looking back at the thread, I also don't see where Ian, Silvia or >> > Tantek's >> > concerns were addressed, but I guess they can speak for themselves. >> > >> > I also do not know where to find a link to the Change Proposal. The only >> > link I can find is this, which is not a proper Change Proposal (among >> > other >> > things it lacks rationale): >> > >> > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Mar/att-0014/canvaselement-issue74-feedback1.html>. >> > Is there a version available that includes rationale? Perhaps that would >> > answer my question. >> >> Since Maciej is digging it out again - of all the things that I asked >> and didn't get an answer for, I would also say that the most important >> is to have a proper change proposal. It is impossible to evaluate what >> the changes mean and what implications they have without such a >> proposal. Such a change proposal might even answer all the questions >> that I still have. In fact, I don't think the TF should allow any >> proposals to be handed on to the HTML WG without a proper written >> change proposal. >> >> Best Regards, >> Silvia. >> > > > > -- > with regards > > Steve Faulkner > Technical Director - TPG Europe > Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium > > www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org > Web Accessibility Toolbar - > http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html >
Received on Tuesday, 16 March 2010 13:30:01 UTC