- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 12:27:41 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7056 --- Comment #16 from Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> 2010-03-15 12:27:41 --- (In reply to comment #13) > Leif: I can't see anything in your pointers to suggest that Ian believes that > whether or not captions should allow flow content is at all affected by the > @summary discussion. No, I probaly didn't understand what he said, right? You can just go back and read the exhanges between me and Ian - you will find a lot of reference to the role of <caption> in most all of them. > In any case I am not Ian and I do not believe there is any > substantial relationship there. > > In any case if you would like to revert this change to the spec for some > reason, I would prefer that you open a new bug setting out the rationale for > restricting the content in <caption> and CC me. I don't know what the official > protocol is here however. Well, you have file a bug saying that flow content should be allowed. Shouldn't you then give a rationale for that? -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 15 March 2010 12:27:46 UTC