- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 21:55:59 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9233 --- Comment #7 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> 2010-03-13 21:55:58 --- (In reply to comment #6) > Mixing directives to UAs and authors in the same section is a bad idea. > > I agree with striking the text as regards Issue 66. However, that is a separate > bug/issue, though it tangentially related. > > During the Issue 66 discussion, several people made requests to add a link to > UAAG within the sections related to UA implementation. This bug is documenting > these requests. > > The UAAG 2.0 specification, section 3.4 does discuss "repairing" text > alternatives, but that section does not entail image analysis heuristics, which > is what is described in the section related to Issue 66. The UAAG 2.0 > guidelines are far more practical. > > However, the information in UAAG 2.0 is purely UA specific in nature, and > should be separate from the authoring guidelines and the general discussion of > the HTML and the alt attribute. > > A better place for the link would be in the UA section, or what would be part > of the UA webcore split, if this split occurs. Yes, placing a link in a UA section makes good sense. Thanks for the clarification Shelley. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Saturday, 13 March 2010 21:56:00 UTC