- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:00:39 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8716 Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |8171 Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Keywords| |TrackerIssue Resolution|FIXED | --- Comment #6 from Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> 2010-03-10 13:00:38 --- The "Guidance for conformance checkers" section of the spec is indeed more readable. http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/text-level-semantics.html#guidance-for-conformance-checkers Thank you for making it a list. But the substantive parts of this bug were not addressed. Adding TrackerIssue Keyword. This bug is part of the change proposal, "Replace img Guidance for Conformance Checkers" for HTML WG Issue 31. http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/ImgElement20090126 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/31 WAI CG Consensus Resolutions on Text alternatives in HTML 5 specifically recommends: <img> is only valid when at least one of the following is true: * @alt is present (empty or non-empty) OR * @aria-labelledby is present (non-empty only) OR * the <img> is located within a <figure> that has a non-empty <legend now figcaption> OR * @role="presentation" It also states they would not oppose creation of a 'autogenerated' and 'missing' attributes. http://www.w3.org/2009/06/Text-Alternatives-in-HTML5 -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 March 2010 13:00:40 UTC