- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 10:07:08 +1100
- To: Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com>
- Cc: Michael Smith <mike@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 9:19 AM, Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com> wrote: > > On Mar 4, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 4:36 AM, Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com> wrote: >>> >>> + The 'enabled' attribute on a <track> in a <trackgroup> should be invalid, as the UA is responsible for selecting the most appropriate track from the alternates. >> >> The 'enabled' attribute is expressing Web author intentions. It can of >> course be overruled by the UA, which has more information about user >> preferences etc. But I think it is important to give the Web author an >> opportunity to express what he/she intends to be on screen. >> > So it is a method for the content author to indicate a track to use if no other track is selected? IOW, this example: > > <trackgroup media="accessibility(captions:yes") > > <track src="en.srt" lang="en" enabled > > <track src="fr.srt" lang="fr" > > <track src="de.srt" lang="de" > > </trackgroup> > > says to use "en.srt" everywhere except German and French systems? > > This seems reasonable to me. > > eric > > Yes, that's indeed how I saw it. And if the Web author makes a mistake and marks more than one (as is also possible in radio buttons), only the first one is regarded as enabled. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 4 March 2010 23:08:00 UTC