W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > March 2010

Re: Survey ready on Media Multitrack API proposal

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 23:09:31 -0800
Cc: "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-id: <5F72CC82-4365-428C-9D3F-544F42957859@apple.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>

On Mar 2, 2010, at 11:03 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:

> Hi Michael,
> I saw your questions on the proposal, so thought I should reply  
> immediately.

Those were actually my questions, but I decided to delete my answer  
for now to avoid unduly influencing the answers of others. (For what  
it's worth, I think this is a good proposal and my questions are  
tangential to my general views on its merits).

>> 1) Is it a common use case to want to get a track by name? Is it  
>> common for tracks in a media file to even have unique names?
>> I am not sure namedItem() is justified.
> A name is the best possible way to address individual tracks. That
> name may well be a number in some media file formats, but the most
> general case is to provide a string.

The name being a number is something that won't work very well with  
the current API, since it will be treated as a numeric index, rather  
than as a name that happens to be a number. If you say tracks[1], is  
that supposed to be the second track, or the one named "1"?

You also didn't answer my second question -  are track names typically  
unique? Do media container formats generally guarantee the presence of  
unique track names?

Received on Wednesday, 3 March 2010 07:10:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:33 UTC