- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:00:19 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10026
Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackalmage@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> 2010-06-29 22:00:18 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> There seems to be no scope attribute for the TD cell in HTML5 but your own
> website gives an example using it:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG-TECHS/H63.html.
The WCAG example seems less than ideal. The cell in question is clearly acting
as a row header, and so should be marked up as a <th> instead.
Allowing @scope on ordinary table-cells (<td>) when it's only intended to be
used for header cells (<th>) doesn't seem to benefit anyone.
> I strongly believer the scope=row
> (at least) should be allowed otherwise one must additionally provide a class
> for the TH element to override the browser styling defaults. The row scope may
> be data in addition to a header so I feel it is relevant to have scope for a TD
> cell.
I don't understand this at all. Why must one put a class on a <th> in order to
override the browser default styling? Presumably the intent is to make a
header cell that looks just like the other cells. This can be done in the
ordinary way by using CSS to just select all the <th> elements.
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2010 22:00:21 UTC