- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 05:39:53 -0600
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "Michael(tm) Smith" <mike@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi Maciej, > Laura and Ian, could you please identify together the parts of this Change > Proposal that are uncontroversial, and make sure they get applied to the > spec ASAP? I have tried to explain in the proposal itself [1] and this thread [2] what the proposal entails. Ian, which parts do you agree with? Which parts will you incorporate into the spec? Thanks. Best Regards, Laura -- Laura L. Carlson [1] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/ChangeProposals/ImgElement20090126 [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jan/thread.html#msg310 On 1/29/10, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > >> >> Ah, ok. It seems unfortunate to go through the whole time-consuming >> process for things that are uncontroversial -- I recommend filing bugs for >> >> the proposals first, especially for the editorial stuff, since I see no >> problem with just doing those. That would save us (the task force) a lot >> of time. > > For any changes that are in fact uncontroversial, I would much prefer if we > could resolve them before evaluating Change Proposals. > > Laura and Ian, could you please identify together the parts of this Change > Proposal that are uncontroversial, and make sure they get applied to the > spec ASAP? > > Regards, > Maciej -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Saturday, 30 January 2010 11:45:43 UTC