- From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 13:19:54 -0600
- To: Steve Faulkner <sfaulkner@paciellogroup.com>
- Cc: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi Steve, I agree with Olaf that the Lady of Shalott examples may be problematic. Poetry markup is an important yet separate issue that Olaf may want to raise a bug [1] [2] [3] [4] to resolve. Until the poetry markup issue is decided, perhaps for 6.1 and 6.2 we could use something like we did for our May 2008 HTMLWG Action 54 [5]: <!-- Full Recitation of Alfred, Lord Tennyson's Poem --> Then the text alternative issue [6] won't be intertwined with the poetry markup issue [7]. Best Regards, Laura [1] http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#basic-step-1 [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/createaccount.cgi [3] http://www.bugzilla.org/docs/3.0/html/using.html [5] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/Action54AltAttribute#head-814d07bab27cf5b1e5059b93250952ca7e7e2bcd-3 [6] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/PoeticSemantics [7] http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/IssueAltAttribute On 1/18/10, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de> wrote: > I think, the section 6 contains improper markup (and problematic content). > Poetry or a stanza/strophe is embedded in a p element. > The current draft of HTML5 as previous versions of HTML notes, > that p represents a paragraph. Paragraphs are prose and no > poetry and cannot contain any substructures like strophe-lines. > > My suggestion is to use either another format to markup > literature/text properly or to use divs with RDFa or some other > mechanism to indicate the role of the divs. > Especially for a non visual representation it is for many > people pretty confusing/depressing, if poetry is presented as prose > (I know this personally, because one of my nephews tends to > recite poetry much like prose ;o) > > > Another problem may occur with the relation of h1, h2, image > and stanza. The current order implies more or less, that > Alfred Lord Tennyson is the author of the poem, the image > and the alternative text - is this really true? > Some metadata (RDF) might be necessary to put the > relations correct. > > This problem is only slightly better handled with example 6.2 > due to the hyperlink (not only because it points to an error 404 page). > > > According to wikipedia > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Lady_of_Shalott > the image seems to show a replication > of an image of John William Waterhouse, not from > Alfred Lord Tennyson, while the alternative text is maybe > from another person, what means, it is effectively an > interpretation of the image, not neccessarily representing > the intentions of the image author. Still it can be an alternative > for the image, however not related directly to the author of > the poem or the image... > > Is there a mechanism currently to relate metadata to the > value of an attribute like alt? If not, it might be better to > replace the old img with a new element with the > possibility to contain the alternative text as element content, > including metadata about the content ;o) > > The sample seems to be already old enough to be public > domain, therefore it is at least not really problematic for the > draft to blur all these relations. However, if the sample is > intended to be useful for current works, one has to put those > relations somewhere due to copyright restrictions - and even > without, I think, the works of authors should be always > honoured by putting the relations correctly. > > > Related discussion about the poetry problem of HTML in the wiki: > http://esw.w3.org/topic/HTML/PoeticSemantics > > > Olaf -- Laura L. Carlson
Received on Monday, 18 January 2010 19:20:28 UTC