- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 10:52:38 -0800 (PST)
- To: "'Shelley Powers'" <shelley.just@gmail.com>, "'Tab Atkins Jr.'" <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "'Gregory J. Rosmaita'" <oedipus@hicom.net>, <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, <public-html@w3.org>
Shelley Powers wrote: > > > I'm not going to get into the semantics of what this type of data is > called, but @summary joins a host of other data, including > microformats, RDFa, data-*, and so on in the fact that they don't have > a default visual display attached. Factually, though, they aren't > "hidden", in that other tools can see the data, as we can ourselves, > just using view source. ...or in properly constructed editing environments. It's a UI tool problem, not a user problem or implementation problem. In fact, should we want to take this further, it could be argued that 'accesskeys' are hidden meta-data too, thus should be considered a hindrance or barrier and removed from the spec. (and to be clear, I am not currently advocating that - in fact I've been turned around on accesskeys). Tab, don't let your eyes and vision be your disability, start thinking outside of the box a little. > > Regardless, I'm not sure that it matters, except for the fact that > there's been an unwarranted assumption expressed too frequently in > these emails that problems will occur if an element or attribute > doesn't have a default browser display. > > There's never been any proof to support such an assumption--only a > hypothesis presented, without any real and tangible way to prove, or > disprove, the hypothesis. > > I don't think there's any wrong with stating an opinion. But I think > it's important that we state opinions as such, rather than as some > form of nebulous unproven "fact". > > If we acknowledge our opinions as such, perhaps our communications > with each other can progress in a positive manner. And we won't > necessarily care what adjectives we attach to @summary, microformats, > RDFa, et al. > > I don't want to hinder this discussion, but I think we need to be > careful about expressing opinion as proven fact. Thank you Shelley for a more metered response than the one that was brewing in my head. What she said! JF
Received on Thursday, 14 January 2010 18:53:13 UTC