- From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 22:56:44 +1100
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: Geoff Freed <geoff_freed@wgbh.org>, Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:10:06 +0800, Silvia Pfeiffer > <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Maybe we have converged? > > Yes, and for the record this is what I think we agree on: > > <track> is used to reference an external text track. > > <trackgroup> is used to group several tracks which are mutually exclusive. > Often they will have the same role="", but this isn't necessarily so. > > Your example with active changed to enabled: > > <video src="video.ogv"> > <track src="cc.en.srt" srclang="en" role="CC" enabled> > <track src="tad.en.srt" srclang="en" role="TAD"> > <trackgroup role="SUB"> > <track src="subs.de.srt" srclang="de"> > <track src="subs.sv.srt" srclang="sv"> > <track src="subs.jp.srt" srclang="jp"> > </trackgroup> > </video> > > <track> is a void element (no end tag), if there any reason to think that it > would ever need child elements then now is the time to give it an end tag. > I've tentatively updated the wiki with this specification (there may be bugs, so please read carefully and fix): http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Media_TextAssociations . We can always roll back if there is disagreement. Cheers, Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 17 February 2010 11:57:36 UTC