- From: Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com>
- Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:14:35 -0800
- To: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
- Cc: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Feb 14, 2010, at 10:35 PM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > > <trackgroup role="subtitles"> > <track src="subtitles.en.srt" lang="en"> > <track src="subtitles.sv.srt" lang="sv"> > <track src="subtitles.fr.srt" lang="fr"> > <track src="subtitles.zh.srt" lang="zh"> > </trackgroup> > <trackgroup role="captions"> > <track src="captions.en.srt" lang="en"> > <track src="captions.sv.srt" lang="sv"> > <track src="captions.fr.srt" lang="fr"> > <track src="captions.zh.srt" lang="zh"> > </trackgroup> > > role="" isn't what makes the tracks alternative, it's that they are in the same <trackgroup>. If <trackgroup> isn't used then all tracks are in the same implicit group and are mutually exclusive. > I see that now, though I think it is much less clear ;-) "track" has a well defined meaning in the context of media files, as a source of a particular type of media data. This is really what and it is what you are calling "trackgroup" here. > (I think my previous suggestion of using <track> as the grouping element and <source> for the individual track was quite confusing.) > Obviously I disagree ;-) eric
Received on Monday, 15 February 2010 07:15:09 UTC