- From: <bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:44:46 +0000
- To: public-html-a11y@w3.org
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8723 steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|NEEDSINFO | --- Comment #2 from steve faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> 2010-02-10 10:44:45 --- >Rationale: I don't understand. Could you elaborate? The focusing steps seem to > handle <area>, and the definition of "focusable" handles <area> specially, so > this all seems well-defined unless I'm missing something. While focus moves to the image map areas, if an area is out of the viewport when it recieves focus it is not moved into the viewport (this behaviour occurs with all other elements on the page no? so suggestion is to define this for area so the behaviour is not disadvantageous to keyboard only users. (In reply to comment #1) > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are > satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If > you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please > reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML > Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest > title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue > yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html > Status: Did Not Understand Request > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: I don't understand. Could you elaborate? The focusing steps seem to > handle <area>, and the definition of "focusable" handles <area> specially, so > this all seems well-defined unless I'm missing something. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2010 10:44:47 UTC