- From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:03:48 +0000
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
I'm not particularly wedded to any syntax, provided its clear what it means. I like the idea of symmetry with src, and also having "incomplete" as a reserved value solves the issue of what to do if there is an alt attribute, and the author states that there isn’t. -----Original Message----- From: Gregory J. Rosmaita [mailto:oedipus@hicom.net] Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:40 PM To: Sean Hayes; HTML Accessibility Task Force Subject: RE: CFC re ISSUE-31 Missing Alt aloha, sean! i agree with you that the repair technique should be in ATAG, but not every author uses an authoring tool (i still do my encoding by hand because i have yet to find an ATAG compliant authoring tool) and such guidance should be addressed somewhere in the HTML5 document suite -- perhaps as part of SteveF's advice on proper use of text alternatives document... crowd-sourcing isn't a reliable solution today, and i think that crowd-sourcing would only work if there was a storage-and-retrieval system such as that which one can use to get metadata about an audio CD -- if you, as creator of that image, properly annotate it, then your metadata should be presented to me first (as the default metadata), and then i should be able to choose amongst other terser or longer descriptions... so, no, as things stand today, with conflicts over metadata schemas i don't think that crowd-sourcing is a viable option, but i can perceive the utility in crowd-sourcing, provided that i am provided with a means of choosing which metadata -- if it exists -- i would like applied, with the author's own metadata as the default... i think that there are also cultural considerations that need to be taken into account -- that was one of the reasons why i put up my photos on MyOpera page: to find out if there were significant differences in perceptions of a common image... but, given cultural considerations, if i were from country X and spoke language Y, i might want to at least check and compare the metadata submitted from country X in language Y to ascertain that which would be self-evident to a sighted user from country x in language Y so, no, i do not think that this is a viable option today or in the near future, but i think it is an approach that does warrant further exploration within the accessibility and standards community... gregory. ---------------------------------------------------------------- CONSERVATIVE, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them with others. -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_ ---------------------------------------------------------------- Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html ---------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com> To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org> Sent: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:17:40 +0000 Subject: RE: CFC re ISSUE-31 Missing Alt > I think Gregory's proposed text; while valid, is more of an ATAG issue > than an HTML one. What I think we need to debate is if there is any > normative remedial action we want to propose for an > HTML5 UA to make if it gets an image where the author has explicitly > said I'm not going to tell you what this image is, or why I included > it. > > I'm not sure that there is, given that the suggested techniques are > heuristic, fragile, and very likely to change over time. > It's something we might want to bring up with the UAAG folks though. > It could be an informative note, but even that may encourage authors > to think that these techniques are more robust than they really are. > > This is slightly different than allowing an attribute for the author > to make the statement in the first place, which we seem to have come > to some consensus on. > > -----Original Message----- > From: public-html-a11y-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-a11y- > request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Singer Sent: Thursday, April 29, > 2010 3:00 AM To: Laura Carlson Cc: Gregory J. Rosmaita; HTML > Accessibility Task Force Subject: Re: CFC re ISSUE-31 Missing Alt > > 'a missing tag' is ambiguous (and 'a missing tag must be generated' > could be seen as a contradiction...) > > a tag stating that 'alt' is known to be missing, perhaps? > > 'which can then be...' appears to be connected to the authoring tool, > rather than this new tag > > overall: > if an authoring tool prompts an author for alt text and the author > explicitly refuses to supply it, then a tag stating that 'alt' is > missing MUST be auto-generated by the authoring tool; the presence of > this tag can then be used to trigger a retrieval process such as that > outlined in the emails on RDFPic [1] and the RDF and Photos W3C Note > [2] > > I'm not at all sure I agree with this approach, but we may as well be > clear about what we are debating! > > On Apr 28, 2010, at 16:51 , Laura Carlson wrote: > > > Hi Gregory, > > > >> my 2 cents (american) on an auto-generated authoring-tool inserted > >> missing alt tag: > >> > >> if an authoring tool prompts an author for alt text and the author > >> explicitly refuses, then a missing tag MUST be auto-generated by > >> the authoring tool, which can then be used to trigger a retrieval > >> process such as that i outlined in my post on RDFPic [1] and the > >> RDF and Photos W3C Note [2] > > > > Thank you very much for this. I added a section on the Change > > Proposal for metadata using your text as a start. > > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Lcarlson/ImgElement#Metadata > > > > Thoughts everyone? Ideas for improvement? Can anyone not live with this? > > > > Best Regards, > > Laura > > > > -- > > Laura L. Carlson > > > > David Singer > Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc. ------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:04:55 UTC