- From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 14:03:48 +0000
- To: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
I'm not particularly wedded to any syntax, provided its clear what it means. I like the idea of symmetry with src, and also having "incomplete" as a reserved value solves the issue of what to do if there is an alt attribute, and the author states that there isn’t.
-----Original Message-----
From: Gregory J. Rosmaita [mailto:oedipus@hicom.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 2:40 PM
To: Sean Hayes; HTML Accessibility Task Force
Subject: RE: CFC re ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
aloha, sean!
i agree with you that the repair technique should be in ATAG, but not every author uses an authoring tool (i still do my encoding by hand because i have yet to find an ATAG compliant authoring
tool) and such guidance should be addressed somewhere in the
HTML5 document suite -- perhaps as part of SteveF's advice on proper use of text alternatives document...
crowd-sourcing isn't a reliable solution today, and i think that crowd-sourcing would only work if there was a storage-and-retrieval system such as that which one can use to get metadata about an audio CD -- if you, as creator of that image, properly annotate it, then your metadata should be presented to me first (as the default metadata), and then i should be able to choose amongst other terser or longer descriptions...
so, no, as things stand today, with conflicts over metadata schemas i don't think that crowd-sourcing is a viable option, but i can perceive the utility in crowd-sourcing, provided that i am provided with a means of choosing which metadata -- if it exists -- i would like applied, with the author's own metadata as the default...
i think that there are also cultural considerations that need to be taken into account -- that was one of the reasons why i put up my photos on MyOpera page: to find out if there were significant differences in perceptions of a common image... but, given cultural considerations, if i were from country X and spoke language Y, i might want to at least check and compare the metadata submitted from country X in language Y to ascertain that which would be self-evident to a sighted user from country x in language Y
so, no, i do not think that this is a viable option today or in the near future, but i think it is an approach that does warrant further exploration within the accessibility and standards community...
gregory.
----------------------------------------------------------------
CONSERVATIVE, n. A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal, who wishes to replace them
with others. -- Ambrose Bierce, _The Devil's Dictionary_
----------------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita, oedipus@hicom.net
Camera Obscura: http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
---------- Original Message -----------
From: Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>
To: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: "Gregory J. Rosmaita" <oedipus@hicom.net>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Sent: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:17:40 +0000
Subject: RE: CFC re ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
> I think Gregory's proposed text; while valid, is more of an ATAG issue
> than an HTML one. What I think we need to debate is if there is any
> normative remedial action we want to propose for an
> HTML5 UA to make if it gets an image where the author has explicitly
> said I'm not going to tell you what this image is, or why I included
> it.
>
> I'm not sure that there is, given that the suggested techniques are
> heuristic, fragile, and very likely to change over time.
> It's something we might want to bring up with the UAAG folks though.
> It could be an informative note, but even that may encourage authors
> to think that these techniques are more robust than they really are.
>
> This is slightly different than allowing an attribute for the author
> to make the statement in the first place, which we seem to have come
> to some consensus on.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-html-a11y-request@w3.org [mailto:public-html-a11y-
> request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Singer Sent: Thursday, April 29,
> 2010 3:00 AM To: Laura Carlson Cc: Gregory J. Rosmaita; HTML
> Accessibility Task Force Subject: Re: CFC re ISSUE-31 Missing Alt
>
> 'a missing tag' is ambiguous (and 'a missing tag must be generated'
> could be seen as a contradiction...)
>
> a tag stating that 'alt' is known to be missing, perhaps?
>
> 'which can then be...' appears to be connected to the authoring tool,
> rather than this new tag
>
> overall:
> if an authoring tool prompts an author for alt text and the author
> explicitly refuses to supply it, then a tag stating that 'alt' is
> missing MUST be auto-generated by the authoring tool; the presence of
> this tag can then be used to trigger a retrieval process such as that
> outlined in the emails on RDFPic [1] and the RDF and Photos W3C Note
> [2]
>
> I'm not at all sure I agree with this approach, but we may as well be
> clear about what we are debating!
>
> On Apr 28, 2010, at 16:51 , Laura Carlson wrote:
>
> > Hi Gregory,
> >
> >> my 2 cents (american) on an auto-generated authoring-tool inserted
> >> missing alt tag:
> >>
> >> if an authoring tool prompts an author for alt text and the author
> >> explicitly refuses, then a missing tag MUST be auto-generated by
> >> the authoring tool, which can then be used to trigger a retrieval
> >> process such as that i outlined in my post on RDFPic [1] and the
> >> RDF and Photos W3C Note [2]
> >
> > Thank you very much for this. I added a section on the Change
> > Proposal for metadata using your text as a start.
> > http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/User:Lcarlson/ImgElement#Metadata
> >
> > Thoughts everyone? Ideas for improvement? Can anyone not live with this?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Laura
> >
> > --
> > Laura L. Carlson
> >
>
> David Singer
> Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
------- End of Original Message -------
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 14:04:55 UTC