W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html-a11y@w3.org > April 2010

Re: Weekly Resolved & Rejected Bugs Report

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 22:37:02 +1000
Message-ID: <n2v2c0e02831004110537g3e464811xf323c234a6b73762@mail.gmail.com>
To: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Cc: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Hi Laura,

On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 7:42 PM, Laura Carlson
<laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1. NEW BUGS:
> Bug 9452: "Handling of additional tracks of a multitrack audio/video
> resource" reported by Silvia Pfeiffer.
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9452
> My View: I recommend that we expedite defining "a11ytf" keyword
> criteria so Silvia knows if the task force can officially work on this
> item or if she has to go it alone. Currently not having the "a11ytf"
> keyword designation blocks the task force from officially working on
> bugs key to the task force mission.

Not sure what that means, but if I'm sorry if I added the "a11ytf"
keyword by mistake. I thought it was one of my actions coming out of
the F2F meeting.

> We currently have five bugs that I am aware of that have had the
> Keyword "a11ytf" applied with no approval from the task force:
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7056
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8674
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8715
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=8827
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9452

That last one is also one that I registered. It is in the same class,
basically, as Bug 9452, and was also discussed at the F2F, so I am
unsure why it ended up in a different categorisation to the other Bug.
Sorry again, if I shouldn't have applied the "a11ytf" keyword.

Received on Sunday, 11 April 2010 12:37:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:55:35 UTC