- From: John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
- To: "'Charles McCathieNevile'" <chaals@opera.com>, "'Laura Carlson'" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "'HTML Accessibility Task Force'" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "'Janina Sajka'" <janina@rednote.net>, "'Michael\(tm\) Smith'" <mike@w3.org>, "'Michael Cooper'" <cooper@w3.org>, "'Judy Brewer'" <jbrewer@w3.org>, <wai-cg@w3.org>
Charles McCathieNevile [mailto:chaals@opera.com] > > John Foliot <jfoliot@stanford.edu> > wrote: > > > While I think that ultimately it would be counter-productive to make too > > much of an issue about this, I do wish to go on record as making it > > known > > that I too am also displeased with this procedural gaff - any > > resolutions > > should have been formally brought back to the entire TF, not just those > > It might > have been helpful to have clarified it in the minutes, Agreed. It would perhaps also have been useful if a condensed listing of proposed resolutions was compiled, as honestly it is difficult to always follow along just using the minutes and IRC log. Discussion is happening now, so no harm, no foul. JF
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 17:02:54 UTC