Re: Moving forward with MultiTrack API [was: Agenda: HTML-A11Y 18 March HEADS UP! at 15:00Z]

On 04/04/2010, at 6:03 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:

> Maciej Stachowiak writes:
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2010, at 1:22 AM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There hasn't been any new feedback on this particular discussion  
>>> for a
>
>
> Actually, there's comment as recently as the last TF call. Are you
> tracking those minutes?

I am tracking them and the comments weren't about the Multitrack API  
but for the Text Associations.


>>> long time. I agree with Michael and Maciej and see no need to delay
>>> this proposal any further, since the recommended changes related to
>>> the consensus check at
>>> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/multitrack-api/results have been
>>> discussed on the list and changes undertaken.
>
>
> It's not yet approved in the TF. Media is on our F2F agenda.

All discussion has been about Text Associations and will reasonably be  
so at the F2F. We had a positive vote on this. We had a CfC on this  
without rejections. How many levels of approval do we require in the TF?

Regards,
Silvia.


> Janina
>
>>>
>>> In view of the 5th April deadline by the HTML WG on making  
>>> progress on
>>> Issue 9 (http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/9), I will post  
>>> this
>>> proposal to the HTML WG on Monday.
>>
>> That would be much appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Maciej
>
> -- 
>
> Janina Sajka,    Phone:    +1.443.300.2200
>        sip:janina@asterisk.rednote.net
>
> Chair, Open Accessibility    janina@a11y.org
> Linux Foundation        http://a11y.org
>
> Chair, Protocols & Formats
> Web Accessibility Initiative    http://www.w3.org/wai/pf
> World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)
>

Received on Saturday, 3 April 2010 22:21:43 UTC