- From: HTeuMeuLeu <remi@hteumeuleu.fr>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 15:08:49 +0200
- To: Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>
- Cc: HTML for email CG <public-htmail@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKZ2RFY9qCN=if1H_C68GncKOVn5L1bSTxCWCe4Pdv_VsMPGmA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Chaals, Thanks for these insights. I totally forgot about the Web Platform Incubator Community Group (https://discourse.wicg.io). My main interrogation now is : should we continue to discuss of HTMail on this platform or on Github ? (or elsewhere ?) Cheers, -- Rémi 2016-07-12 12:59 GMT+02:00 Chaals McCathie Nevile <chaals@yandex-team.ru>: > Hi, > > One thing people might like to do is propose changes to the core HTML > specification. Since I co-chair the W3C's Web Platform Working Group who > maintains that specification, I thought it might be helpful to explain how > that group works… (I'll try to find someone to do the same for CSS) > > The specification is on github, and the preferred means for feedback is to > raise an issue: > https://github.com/w3c/html/issues > (please do a quick search to see if your issue is already known…) > > There is at least one issue tagged "HTML email" - a tag I can put onto any > issue so we can track them: > https://github.com/w3c/html/labels/HTML%20email > > If your issue is clearly related to email I will tag it. > > Nothing will be added to the HTML specification unless it has > interoperable implementation - before that you should incubate it in an > appropriate community such as this one. > > You should provide some sense of what needs to change in the HTML > specification, what problem this solves for whom, who implements the > proposal, who supports it, and some test(s) that can be used to work out > whether an implementation has done it right. > > After that there may be a formal "Call for Consensus" of the Working > Group, or if there is an obvious consensus it may just be taken up by the > editors and added to a milestone. > > If you are proposing a substantial change, it is helpful if you either > join the Working Group, or make an IPR commitment - W3C takes seriously its > goal of ensuring that we don't put things in specifications without a > Royalty-Free licensing commitment over any IPR. If you're not a W3C member, > email me and I can explain the process, which is not very onerous. > > If you want to float an idea for HTML in front of browser implementors, > get help specifying it, etc, you are welcome to do so in the Web Platform > Incubator Community Group: > https://discourse.wicg.io > > The Working Group is in the process of finalising HTML 5.1, and beginning > work on HTML 5.2. The current plans are to produce a "W3C Recommendation" > every year or two, which covers things that are implemented, interoperable, > and still agreed to be good ideas. We are also trying to modularise HTML - > so if you want to propose a big new thing, it's likely that we'll ask for > it as a "module" that can be integrated mostly by reference, rather than > adding 7000 lines to the HTML specification itself. > > cheers > > Chaals > > -- > Charles McCathie Nevile - web standards - CTO Office, Yandex > chaals@yandex-team.ru - - - Find more at http://yandex.com > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 13:09:43 UTC