- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:37:56 -0700
- To: Michiel Sikma <mike@letsdeliver.com>
- Cc: Alan Stearns <stearns@adobe.com>, "public-houdini@w3.org" <public-houdini@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Michiel Sikma <mike@letsdeliver.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 7:36 AM, Michiel Sikma <mike@letsdeliver.com> >> wrote: >> > - Devices such as the LG G3 can switch between different device-radius >> > values. Would there be an added value, in this case, in making it possible >> > for items to transition from regular to non-polar coordinates? >> >> Can you elaborate on this? The G3 appears to be a (rectangular) phone, >> so what's the relevance of device-radius to it? > > It's normally got a rectangular screen, but when you close the phone it > shows a round screen on the lid. It's shown as the first image on chapter 4 > of the PDF. Ah, I didn't see there was a pdf! I didn't catch this example when I saw the presentation, thanks for pointing it out. >> > Also, there might be some value in extending Flexbox for round layouts, >> > maybe. For instance, being able to position menu elements like on the LG G3 >> > cover screen (see part 4 of the PDF), and then re-order them by changing the >> > order attribute. >> >> One of the benefits of producing a custom layout spec is that authors >> will be able to write this kind of thing for themselves. ^_^ > > Yeah. The PDF mentions these are 'minimal extensions needed to support a > round display'. Even just these few things (mostly flowing content and > border shaping) are going to be challenging to implement, though, and > there's going to be lots of other corollary issues to resolve. Indeed; border-shaping will be especially difficult. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 9 March 2015 21:38:42 UTC