- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 17:16:47 -0700
- To: Paul Irish <paul.irish@gmail.com>
- Cc: "public-houdini@w3.org" <public-houdini@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Paul Irish <paul.irish@gmail.com> wrote: > I want to keep all my style information in the stylesheet, even things not > consistently supported across all browsers. I want to drop in a JS polyfill > for those ones. This is the troublesome bit. We want to preserve CSS's ability to innovate in names, without worrying about name collision with custom stuff from the community. HTML did this by requiring custom elements to have a dash in them, CSS does this by requiring custom things to start with two dashes. In HTML you can technically use elements with custom names without dashes, but that's a legacy issue only - they aren't real Custom Elements and can't be used with that API, they're just weird <span>s with strange names. CSS made the right decision from the beginning and dropped the unknown stuff entirely. > I need a hook for unrecognized items like rulesets, @at-rules and selectors. <http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-extensions/>, when I finish writing it, will give hooks for custom versions of all of these things. You won't be able to directly intercept stuff that's valid in one browser but unknown in another, but you will be able to create a custom ~whatever~ that can delegate to the built-in version when possible, and do something custom in older browsers. > For rulesets, I want a mechanism to address matching elements. Could you expand on this? Do you mean like, a way to tell what elements will match a given selector, and get informed when new elements match it, or old elements stop matching it? ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2015 00:17:34 UTC