- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 18:58:55 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
I don't recall having that discussion either (but that doesn't mean it didn't occur - my memory is notoriously faulty). Happy to either fix the spec to match impls or leave it and let impls get fixed, tho. I don't think I care too much how it goes, but making the actual rule invalid in simple grammatical failures like this *is* the more common behavior, and is what is generally meant by "X is invalid" across our specs. Per blame, this text does come directly from @andruud (<https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/commit/a5cd596795624c596911ecb7efda5de0f3652d89>) and was early in their spec-writing career, so it was likely just some loose wording. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/1098#issuecomment-1696215484 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 28 August 2023 18:58:57 UTC