Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [typed-om] Trim CSSResourceValue and subclasses to opaque objects for this level, punt rest to level 2

The Working Group just discussed `[typed-om] Trim CSSResourceValue and subclasses to opaque objects for this level, punt rest to level 2`.

<details><summary>The full IRC log of that discussion</summary>
&lt;dael> Topic:  [typed-om] Trim CSSResourceValue and subclasses to opaque objects for this level, punt rest to level 2<br>
&lt;dael> github: https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/716<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: now that we have TabAtkins<br>
&lt;TabAtkins> I'LL LITERALLY JUST BE FIVE SECONDS OR SO<br>
&lt;dael> [everyone curses Tab's internet]<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: This was brought up a week o r two ago as an ask f or review. Ana had some discussion.<br>
&lt;Chris> s/Ana/Anne<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: Big points: I did discuss rough outline before. Newer bits: because CSS distinguishes between normal a nd fragment-only URLs we want to reflect that in the URL structure somehow. To say this is full o r fragment. My plan was storing what it was, but Anne remarked hewould prefer if it was refered more directly either as a bolean or a sep URL class. franremy had a weak preference<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I'll do those edits soon. Any opinions let me know. Otherwise I'll do what I outline in the thread here.<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Any other opinions for TabAtkins to consider?<br>
&lt;dael> astearns: Alright. We're on notice you're going to change.<br>
&lt;dael> TabAtkins: I guess not. Wanted to ping for review because it's a  decent change.<br>
</details>


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by css-meeting-bot
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/716#issuecomment-371334099 using your GitHub account

Received on Thursday, 8 March 2018 00:25:24 UTC