- From: andruud via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2018 15:29:33 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
andruud has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts: == [css-properties-values-api] Syntax-checking in CSSStyleDeclaration.setProperty == In the current implementation of css-properties-values-api/cssom in Blink, it is not allowed to set a registered custom property to an invalid value using setProperty. The value is just discarded. **Should setProperty still discard invalid values for registered custom properties?** Example: ``` <!DOCTYPE html> <script> CSS.registerProperty({ name: '--color', syntax: '<color>', initialValue: 'green', inherits: false }); </script> <style>div { --color: red; }</style> <div id=target></div> <script> // Has no effect: target.style.setProperty('--color', 'url("not-a-url")'); // Actual: red // Expected (by andruud): green console.log(getComputedStyle(target).getPropertyValue('--color')); </script> ``` This was allegedly [1] the agreed-upon behavior at some point, but as of https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/commit/8dfc2d985618a23f97e05c42f7ef6b083ef3256d , this behavior seems inconsistent. I think it's more in line with the new spec wording to let setProperty ignore whether the property is registered or not, and do syntax-checking computed-value time. [1] https://codereview.chromium.org/2607403002 Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/778 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 5 July 2018 15:29:36 UTC