- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:02:17 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
> It's also not clear to me if the Typed OM spec is intended that the typed OM object tree is the underlying representation. It's not, the TypedOM form is meant to be equivalent to serialization - it's an input/output format that captures enough of the nuance, but the internal representation can be richer. I'll make it clearer. > I don't think the information in 5.8. List of CSS properties to their CSSStyleValue reification is anywhere near sufficient for this to be interoperable. Correct, it's not. We're starting work on getting the list in the second half of that chapter filled in with more direct information. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/718#issuecomment-368649141 using your GitHub account
Received on Monday, 26 February 2018 21:02:55 UTC