- From: Majid Valipour via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 18:18:44 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
_From @appsforartists on September 27, 2016 21:15_ If the animators are already required to be pure, I think the first alternative (an anonymous function with certain values set on it) is the clearest representation. It's reasonable for an author to assume that a class instance has mutable state that persists across frames. Otherwise, it ought to just be a function. If this is the structure of the Houdini APIs in general, it sounds like a bigger discussion. I'll pick @bfgeek's brain next time I see him. -- GitHub Notification of comment by majido Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/809#issuecomment-417053614 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 29 August 2018 18:18:45 UTC