- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2018 18:13:24 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
bfgeek has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts: == [css-layout-api] Review the LayoutOptions.sizing parameter == I've introduced a new option for the layout, which should help out a little for servo, and easier for implementations to implement initially. ```js registerLayout('foo', class { static layoutOptions = {sizing: 'block-like'}; // or {sizing: 'manual'} *layout(children, edges, constraints, styleMap, breakToken) { constraints.fixedInlineSize; // For 'block-like' sizing this *always* fixed, its never null. return {autoBlockSize: 100}; // Now autoBlockSize is the size if 'block-size' was 'auto'. // The actual block-size might get affected by max-height, height, etc.. } }); ``` For the `'manual'` sizing mode: ```js registerLayout('foo', class { static layoutOptions = {sizing: 'manual'}; *layout(children, edges, constraints, styleMap, breakToken) { constraints.fixedInlineSize; // This may exist, e.g. abs-pos'd, layout, auto within block container (see sizing interactions). return {inlineSize: 100, blockSize: 100}; // These do something in this mode // they get ignored if constraints.fixedInlineSize, fixedBlockSize exist still, // but otherwise they are the size of the fragment. } }); ``` Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/747 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 7 April 2018 18:13:29 UTC