- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 08:01:35 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
Yeah, this looks good; when you described it in the meeting I didn't realize you'd added that additional wording. The one minor comment is that "is expected to be run" should probably be a more normative phrase -- maybe **must**, although maybe **should** if there's a good reason for it not to be **must**. -- GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/pull/390#issuecomment-294721123 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 08:01:43 UTC