Re: [css-houdini-drafts] [css-typed-om]: There's no nice way to represent CSSUnparsedValue as a "list-plus" style object.

One point that might have been missed in the above discussion is that anywhere you accept a `sequence<sometype>`, the type-checking is automatically done for you. So

> we'd have to handle it via checking every set, iterating over it, even in cases where you haven't done anything wrong, which is more computation than is required.

Doesn't seem very accurate, because you do that anyway, I think.

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by domenic
Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/239#issuecomment-294665684 using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 18 April 2017 03:33:04 UTC