- From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:46:25 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
dbaron has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts: == [css-paint-api] should paintWorker be a property on window (and thus be in the global namespace)? == One thing that came up in the TAG review is that css-paint-api [adds a <code>paintWorklet</code> property to Window](https://drafts.css-houdini.org/css-paint-api/#paint-worklet). (See @travisleithead's https://github.com/w3ctag/spec-reviews/issues/140#issuecomment-256214435 .) Since this is on Window, it's polluting the global scope. While we weren't necessarily against this, there was at least some concern over this, and thought it was worth hearing what alternatives were considered, and what led to the decision to add to <code>Window</code>. One alternative that came to mind was [<code>window.CSS</code>](https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#css). Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/330 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 19:46:31 UTC