- From: shans via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:50:19 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
It's fine to use typed custom properties to define part of a complex value, but I don't think we should do things like "let this generic list of lengths substitute into a place that needs a definite number of lengths". Instead we should have a type that represents that subcomponent, and use that. -- GitHub Notification of comment by shans Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-252127622 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 7 October 2016 00:50:26 UTC