- From: Tab Atkins Jr. via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 22:51:11 +0000
- To: public-houdini-archive@w3.org
Right, we're not talking about Typed OM here. What we've got instead is that, per the grammar of --length-list (presumably `<length>+`), we're gonna substitute in some number of lengths. We know that's three, so the value we end up with is "<color> <length> <length> <length>", which is valid for box-shadow. > Is there a reason we decided that typed properties can't fallback to untyped substitution? For example I think typed properties should still substitute into untyped custom properties? I remember we had a discussion around this back in Sydney in January but I don't remember the details. I don't recall. They should be able to sub into untyped properties; I imagine they'd get down-converted back into some equivalent token representation. This isn't well-specced. -- GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/css-houdini-drafts/issues/321#issuecomment-252110414 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 6 October 2016 22:51:18 UTC