RE: Formal objections to Encrypted Media Extensions

Issues 288, 304 and 305 are now closed.

Jerry

From: Jerry Smith (WPT) [mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:49 AM
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com) <ddorwin@google.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>
Cc: public-hme-editors@w3.org
Subject: RE: Formal objections to Encrypted Media Extensions

I will do this, Paul.

From: Paul Cotton
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 11:36 AM
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>> (ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>) <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>
Cc: public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: rE: Formal objections to Encrypted Media Extensions

Can one of the EME Editors please close issues 288, 304 and 305?  I have added a comment pointing to the below message to each issue.

/paulc

From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com]
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 2:27 PM
To: 'public-html-media@w3.org' <public-html-media@w3.org<mailto:public-html-media@w3.org>>
Subject: Formal objections to Encrypted Media Extensions

The HME WG has recently received several Formal Objections to EME progressing to Proposed Recommendation.

These recent formal objections are listed below:

a) ISSUE-288: "EME is not intended to be an interface to technical protection measures"
https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues/288
Author: Wendy Seltzer

b) ISSUE-304: Turn off EME by default and activate only with express permission from user
https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues/304
Author: Harry Halpin

c) ISSUE-305: Formal objection to Encrypted Media Extensions advancing to Proposed Recommendation
https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues/305
Author:  Ruben Rodriguez

Since these formal objections:

a)       cannot be satisfied without making "substantive changes" [1] to the EME specification or halting work on the specification entirely, and/or

b)      are identical to previous formal objections that the Director has chosen not to sustain, and/or

c)       there is no consensus within the HME WG for the required changes especially this late in the EME specification development,
in my role as HME WG Chair I am ruling that these issues should be closed with no action for EME V1.

Each of these Formal Objections will be added to the summary page of formal objections [1] and will be presented to the Director when he reviews a request to progress EME to Proposed Recommendation status.

FTR I responded with background earlier on the topic of EME formal objections in:
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016Aug/0081.html
https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016Aug/0078.html

/paulc
HME WG Chair

[1] http://www.w3.org/2015/Process-20150901/#substantive-change
[2] https://dev.w3.org/html5/status/formal-objection-status.html

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329