- From: Philippe Le Hégaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 08:13:59 -0400
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Cc: "David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com)" <ddorwin@google.com>, "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, "public-hme-editors@w3.org" <public-hme-editors@w3.org>
On 10/26/2016 9:10 PM, Mark Watson wrote: > My question, though, is whether EME V2 should take the form of a > completely new version of the specification that would (eventually) > replace the existing one, or whether we should have a stand-alone > specification adding the "persistent-usage-record" session type. The > latter is hard to do without monkey-patching unless we introduce > explicit extension points. Hi Mark, here is what I would recommend we do: We don't touch the gh-pages branch. Instead, we create a V1 branch for now and use that one to remove whatever we need to. If folks want to publish a separate Note for the removed feature, there will always be time to remove the feature from the gh-pages branch later on. Paul is ok with this so feel free to move forward if you'd like to. Philippe
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 12:14:07 UTC