RE: Generating June 9 working drafts

Since it is past 11:30pm EDT and since I can see recent changes in at  http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/ I am going forward with the EME CfC.

/paulc

From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:17 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; public-hme-editors@w3.org
Subject: RE: Generating June 9 working drafts

With all the EME V1 issues closed and with the issue boxes we agreed to being removed, I am ready to issue the EME CR CfC.

Are all the recent changes reflect in the “June 10 Editors Draft” branch at  http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/?


Can at least one of the EME Editors confirm we are ready to go?

/paulc

From: Jerry Smith (WPT)
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 10:43 PM
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>
Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Generating June 9 working drafts

You caught me a moment too late.  I entered this comment:

    Issue #246 carries forward some discussion topics for EME during CR. Issue #110 is closed.

If I’m off, please correct.  I’m heading out now though.

Thanks David.

Jerry

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:41 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>
Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

#246 is just related, but not a replacement.

I'm still replying to Henri. I hate to close the conversation on him. You might at least note that the conversation can continue, but we consider the original blocking item addressed.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
I’m going to assume yes based on David’s LGTM below.  #110 is now closed.

David:  Please confirm when you see this.

Jerry

From: Jerry Smith (WPT) [mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:36 PM
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>
Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Generating June 9 working drafts

Might we close #110 to reflect we are ready, issue #85 as a noted exception?

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:33 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>
Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

Jerry has landed it. The spec LGTM.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
I’m working on it now.

From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:06 PM
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>
Cc: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>

Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts



On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:03 PM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>> wrote:
Jerry or Mark, can you remove those four?

I could remove them, but not until about 2-3 hours from now.

...Mark
I'm replying to Henri in #110. I don't think it's strictly related to #110, so I don't consider that bocking.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Perhaps remove then #192, #207, #101 and #85; plus Issue 3?

That leaves #221, #219, #242 and #237 for cleanup during CR.

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:50 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>

Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

One (ISSUE 3) does not have an issue, but I think we can remove it. Summary:

  *   #192, #207, #101: We could remove all those related to VNext issues.
  *   #221: I think PING members plan to review now that we've addressed #117, etc.
  *   ISSUE 3: I'm not sure there is anything to do here. I heard the Second Screen CG is including this topic in their re-charter.
  *   #85: Covered by the at risk statement.
  *   #219, #242 and #237 seem like something we can address in CR.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
There are 10 issue boxes in the spec, I believe all with active issues behind them.  I assumed they’d not be removed for CR, but perhaps later.

From: Paul Cotton
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:38 PM
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>
Cc: public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Generating June 9 working drafts


There are two red ISSUE boxes in the EME SOTD for #192 AND #221.  Can these be removed?  Are there any others in the document?

<image001.jpg>

/paulc



-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:29 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>
Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts



One change here. Our systems [1] switched to tomorrow (June 10) already (?).



If it is issued, the CfC for EME will now have to use



  http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/




Philippe



[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2016Jun/