RE: Generating June 9 working drafts

Might we close #110 to reflect we are ready, issue #85 as a noted exception?

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:33 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
Cc: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; public-hme-editors@w3.org
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

Jerry has landed it. The spec LGTM.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
I’m working on it now.

From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 7:06 PM
To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>
Cc: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>

Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts



On Jun 9, 2016, at 7:03 PM, David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>> wrote:
Jerry or Mark, can you remove those four?

I could remove them, but not until about 2-3 hours from now.

...Mark
I'm replying to Henri in #110. I don't think it's strictly related to #110, so I don't consider that bocking.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
Perhaps remove then #192, #207, #101 and #85; plus Issue 3?

That leaves #221, #219, #242 and #237 for cleanup during CR.

From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:50 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>

Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts

One (ISSUE 3) does not have an issue, but I think we can remove it. Summary:

  *   #192, #207, #101: We could remove all those related to VNext issues.
  *   #221: I think PING members plan to review now that we've addressed #117, etc.
  *   ISSUE 3: I'm not sure there is anything to do here. I heard the Second Screen CG is including this topic in their re-charter.
  *   #85: Covered by the at risk statement.
  *   #219, #242 and #237 seem like something we can address in CR.

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>> wrote:
There are 10 issue boxes in the spec, I believe all with active issues behind them.  I assumed they’d not be removed for CR, but perhaps later.

From: Paul Cotton
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:38 PM
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>
Cc: public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: RE: Generating June 9 working drafts


There are two red ISSUE boxes in the EME SOTD for #192 AND #221.  Can these be removed?  Are there any others in the document?

<image001.jpg>

/paulc



-----Original Message-----
From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org]
Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:29 PM
To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>
Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org>
Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts



One change here. Our systems [1] switched to tomorrow (June 10) already (?).



If it is issued, the CfC for EME will now have to use



  http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/




Philippe



[1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2016Jun/