- From: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 19:03:02 -0700
- To: "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "public-hme-editors@w3.org" <public-hme-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAHD2rsgU_=FRn1AzTGQeX0_Bt-_-a9diwCQ8WRH5Xj4d2ZX2fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Jerry or Mark, can you remove those four? I'm replying to Henri in #110. I don't think it's strictly related to #110, so I don't consider that bocking. On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> wrote: > Perhaps remove then #192, #207, #101 and #85; plus Issue 3? > > > > That leaves #221, #219, #242 and #237 for cleanup during CR. > > > > *From:* David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:50 PM > *To:* Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret < > plh@w3.org>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; public-hme-editors@w3.org > > *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts > > > > One (ISSUE 3) does not have an issue, but I think we can remove it. > Summary: > > - #192, #207, #101: We could remove all those related to VNext issues. > - #221: I think PING members plan to review now that we've addressed > #117, etc. > - ISSUE 3: I'm not sure there is anything to do here. I heard the > Second Screen CG is including this topic in their re-charter. > - #85: Covered by the at risk statement. > - #219, #242 and #237 seem like something we can address in CR. > > > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> > wrote: > > There are 10 issue boxes in the spec, I believe all with active issues > behind them. I assumed they’d not be removed for CR, but perhaps later. > > > > *From:* Paul Cotton > *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:38 PM > *To:* Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; > Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Jerry Smith (WPT) < > jdsmith@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* public-hme-editors@w3.org > *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts > > > > There are two red ISSUE boxes in the EME SOTD for #192 AND #221. Can > these be removed? Are there any others in the document? > > /paulc > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org <plh@w3.org>] > Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:29 PM > To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Matt Wolenetz < > wolenetz@google.com>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; > public-hme-editors@w3.org > Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts > > > > One change here. Our systems [1] switched to tomorrow (June 10) already > (?). > > > > If it is issued, the CfC for EME will now have to use > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/ > > > > Philippe > > > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2016Jun/ > > >
Attachments
- image/jpeg attachment: image001.jpg
Received on Friday, 10 June 2016 02:03:51 UTC