One (ISSUE 3) does not have an issue, but I think we can remove it. Summary: - #192, #207, #101: We could remove all those related to VNext issues. - #221: I think PING members plan to review now that we've addressed #117, etc. - ISSUE 3: I'm not sure there is anything to do here. I heard the Second Screen CG is including this topic in their re-charter. - #85: Covered by the at risk statement. - #219, #242 and #237 seem like something we can address in CR. On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 6:47 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> wrote: > There are 10 issue boxes in the spec, I believe all with active issues > behind them. I assumed they’d not be removed for CR, but perhaps later. > > > > *From:* Paul Cotton > *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 6:38 PM > *To:* Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>; David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; > Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Jerry Smith (WPT) < > jdsmith@microsoft.com> > *Cc:* public-hme-editors@w3.org > *Subject:* RE: Generating June 9 working drafts > > > > There are two red ISSUE boxes in the EME SOTD for #192 AND #221. Can > these be removed? Are there any others in the document? > > /paulc > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org <plh@w3.org>] > Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 9:29 PM > To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Matt Wolenetz < > wolenetz@google.com>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; > public-hme-editors@w3.org > Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts > > > > One change here. Our systems [1] switched to tomorrow (June 10) already > (?). > > > > If it is issued, the CfC for EME will now have to use > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2016/WD-encrypted-media-20160610/ > > > > Philippe > > > > [1] https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tr-notifications/2016Jun/ >
(image/jpeg attachment: image002.jpg)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:53:09 UTC