- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 21:02:17 +0000
- To: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Matthew Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> (wolenetz@google.com)" <wolenetz@google.com>, "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>
- CC: "public-hme-editors@w3.org" <public-hme-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CY1PR03MB1423E16A4807F3CD93E589A6EA5F0@CY1PR03MB1423.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
FYI, I am going out to a business appointment at 5:45pm EDT this evening and will be away from my desk until approximately 9pm EDT. I would appreciate someone in the PDT zone replying to this message before 9pm EDT (6pm PDT) giving me the current status of each of the specs. /paulc From: David Dorwin [mailto:ddorwin@google.com] Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 3:19 PM To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com> Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; public-hme-editors@w3.org Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts I am focused on this all day as I have been all week. I agree, I think we will be able to get the major blocking issues addressed. I think review turnaround will be the bottleneck going forward. I have two outstanding pull requests. The first is fairly large and touches a lot of text, so we should try to land that ASAP to avoid conflicts. * https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/pull/238 * https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/pull/235 Those two PRs address most of #117 and #231, respectively. There is some refactoring to be done to wrap up #117, but that depends on landing #238. The refactoring should be straightforward. #110 is mostly fixed, but there is some discussion there. I doubt we will reach a conclusion on that today. #233 is essentially an IDL discussion. We could make a change, but I'm not sure we'll have confirmation on the correctness today. Note: I believe the registry links will be broken unless we land https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/pull/213. I provided feedback. Philippe, what is your plan here? On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>> wrote: I am available most of today to work on the remaining issues. I expect we can get them done. But since no time zone was attached to the June 9 deadline, it might be best for Phillipe to expect to produce the working drafts tomorrow. ...Mark On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote: Can you please give us an update on when the remaining EME V1 issues will be closed? Can you get them ALL done today as planned? /paulc -----Original Message----- From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>] Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2016 2:40 PM To: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org> Subject: Re: Generating June 9 working drafts I'm testing around #91. http://jay.w3.org/~plehegar/trackdefault.html http://jay.w3.org/~plehegar/trackdefaultlist.html As far as I can tell, only Chrome implements this part. I tried on Edge and Firefox and it doesn't seem to work at all. Is that correct? Philippe On 06/09/2016 02:13 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) wrote: > Just commented on #91. The kinds sequence needs to be accessed from > within an algorithm. Is that simple to do? If so, this doesn’t look hard. > > Jerry > > *From:*Matt Wolenetz [mailto:wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 9, 2016 11:12 AM > *To:* Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> > *Cc:* David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com<mailto:ddorwin@google.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT) > <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>) > <plh@w3.org<mailto:plh@w3.org>>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; > public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: Generating June 9 working drafts > > #5 is fixed, so MSE v1 only has #91 remaining. > > On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com> > <mailto:wolenetz@google.com<mailto:wolenetz@google.com>>> wrote: > > Both of the MSE issues are pending action from other editors: > > #5 has a PR pending review. > #91 needs input. Philippe, can you help on that one, since it's > related to a problem with webidl and the recent sequence type change > in MSE? > > Matt > > On Jun 9, 2016 8:10 AM, "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> > <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>>> wrote: > > EME V1 issues (6 including ISSUE-85): > > https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/issues?milestone=1 > > MSE V1 issues (2): > > https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues?milestone=2 > > Philippe is ready to generate the June 9 MSE and EME working > drafts that will be referenced in the WG CfC’s to publish them > as Candidate Recommendations. > > When will the Editors be done with V1 issues? > > /paulc > > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada > > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3 > > Tel: (425) 705-9596<tel:%28425%29%20705-9596> <tel:%28425%29%20705-9596> Fax: (425) > 936-7329 <tel:%28425%29%20936-7329> >
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 21:02:55 UTC