- From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 22:56:52 +0000
- To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
- CC: "public-hme-editors@w3.org" <public-hme-editors@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BN6PR03MB2946B7880A33A63A43C8A4EAEA0E0@BN6PR03MB2946.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
> the very latest version of the common infrastructure files (content, metadata, utilities). Jerry could you review this part of the PR as a priority so it can be merged first? From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:55 PM To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> Cc: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; public-hme-editors@w3.org Subject: Re: Test issue tracking On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:42 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote: Should we split the PR once Jerry provides feedback on the first part? I could split it, but I would like the first one to be merged to include the very latest version of the common infrastructure files (content, metadata, utilities). These, hopefully, will not change much from now on, except in additive ways, but they have changed a lot since I created the PR. ...Mark From: Jerry Smith (WPT) Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 6:42 PM To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> Cc: public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org> Subject: RE: Test issue tracking I have some code review comments coming, Mark. It doesn’t include the new files, but addresses the first 14 you committed. From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2016 3:04 PM To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> Cc: Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com<mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org> Subject: Re: Test issue tracking All, I'm continuing to add tests to the pull request (https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/3324), however that pull request is getting rather gigantic now. It would be great to have some review of that, so that I can get it committed, and then further additions can be in more granular PRs. ...Mark On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:14 AM, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>> wrote: On Jul 26, 2016, at 8:10 AM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com<mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote: Are there any MSE or EME web-platform testing issues that need attention? Yes: 1) Reviewing the Pull Request I made 2) Migrating any of the remaining Google tests 3) Adding further tests if necessary LMK which tests your are working on if you look at (2). I will be working today on tests that require multiple keys. ...Mark /paulc From: Jerry Smith (WPT) [mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 4:43 PM To: Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com<mailto:watsonm@netflix.com>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org> Subject: RE: Test issue tracking I believe we want to enter them under web-platform-tests and apply the “encrypted-media” label. Jerry From: Mark Watson [mailto:watsonm@netflix.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 12:30 PM To: public-hme-editors@w3.org<mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org> Subject: Test issue tracking If we want to track issues with the testing work, should we do that in our EME / MSE repo's or in web-platform-tests ? ...Mark
Received on Tuesday, 26 July 2016 22:57:27 UTC