- From: Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2016 12:24:06 -0700
- To: "Jerry Smith (WPT)" <jdsmith@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Francois Daoust <fd@w3.org>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com)" <ddorwin@google.com>, Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>, "public-hme-editors@w3.org" <public-hme-editors@w3.org>, Iraj Sodagar <irajs@microsoft.com>, John Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com>
- Message-ID: <CAADho6PrDOKUdTdjWx0Z8J7n9dqaLPseGdwd5dkkgbe6vBJ8xw@mail.gmail.com>
5 of those MSE V1Editorial Pulls were still pending review today. I'm rebasing and landing them, since I don't think any are substantive or controversial, and they improve the quality of the spec. - https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pull/107 - https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pull/108 - https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pull/109 - https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pull/111 - https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pull/112 Please reactivate their underlying issues if you note any concern with these. Matt On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Matt Wolenetz <wolenetz@google.com> wrote: > Jerry, et al, I have 11 pending media-source v1Editorial pull requests > pending review currently: > https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+author%3Awolenetz+sort%3Acreated-asc > > As these build on each other, and also as some of them update the byte > stream format registry (and bytestream format specs), please review these > ASAP so they can land and give plh@ time to subsequently > fix (while he's available this week) > https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/74 without causing major merge > conflicts/etc. > > Thanks, > Matt > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Jerry Smith (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> *W3C EME Test Status* >> >> >> >> *Overview:* >> >> Many thanks to the contributions of Greg Rutz (CableLabs) and Michael >> Stattmann (CastLabs) for their assistance in developing a test framework >> for browser and CDM multi-DRM interoperability. >> >> >> >> The planned approach is: >> >> 1. Evaluate current test coverage: Determine the coverage of >> the EME spec provided by the Google Clear Key tests. DONE >> >> 2. Convert current tests to multi-DRM: Modify the Clear Key >> tests so that they can be used in the CableLabs defined multi-DRM >> environment. BEGUN >> >> 3. Fill in the gaps in coverage: Extend the existing test >> framework to cover all tests the editors and W3C consider to be required. >> UNDER DISCUSSION >> >> >> >> *Details:* >> >> Coverage Analysis: >> >> An analysis was completed of the existing Clear Key based EME tests, >> mapping them to the EME specification. It was determined that converting >> the existing clear key tests gives us moderate coverage. Here is a link to >> that analysis: >> >> >> >> - >> https://rawgit.com/jdsmith3000/encrypted-media-testcoverage/master/index.html >> >> >> >> Modifying Google Clear Key Tests: >> >> Google submitted a set of EME unit tests to W3C ( >> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/tree/master/encrypted-media/Google). >> The tests cover Clear Key, but are planned to be extended to cover >> multi-DRM. Each test needs to be extended for each supported DRM and >> multi-DRM signaling must be included. The updated tests should then detect >> and test each CDM supported by the user agent. >> >> >> >> As Greg Rutz made clear in his previous posting, we plan to update >> existing Clear Key tests to use existing multi-purpose DRM-license request >> logic from CastLabs. This process has begun, converting a small number of >> selected Clear Key tests to multi-DRM. Once that is completed, we will >> develop a generalized approach to multi-Format and multi-DRM testing for >> the remaining tests. We hope to distribute additional test conversion work >> across other resources. >> >> >> >> Filling in the Gaps in Coverage >> >> The test coverage report identifies EME spec methods and attributes which >> are not covered by a test plan based on the existing Clear Key tests. >> Identified gaps include: >> >> >> >> - 3.1.2.2 Get Supported Configuration and Consent >> >> - 3.1.2.3 Get Supported Capabilities for Audio/Video Type >> >> - 3.1.2.5 Get Consent Status >> >> - 3.2 MediaKeySystemConfiguration: distinctiveIdentifier of >> type MediaKeysRequirement, defaulting to "optional" >> >> - 3.2 MediaKeySystemConfiguration: label of type DOMString, >> defaulting to "" >> >> - 3.2 MediaKeySystemConfiguration: persistentState of type >> MediaKeysRequirement, defaulting to "optional" >> >> - 3.2 MediaKeySystemConfiguration: sessionTypes of type >> sequence >> >> - 5.2.2 CDM Unavailable >> >> - 5.3 Storage and Persistence >> >> - 6.1 MediaKeySession Attributes: expiration of type >> unrestricted double, readonly >> >> - 6.1 MediaKeySession Attributes: onkeystatuseschange of type >> EventHandler >> >> - 6.2 MediaKeySession Methods: load >> >> - 6.6.2 Update Key Statuses >> >> - 6.6.3 Update Expiration >> >> - 6.6.5 MediaKeySession Destroyed >> >> - 6.6.6 Monitor for CDM State Changes >> >> - 6.8 Session Storage and Persistence >> >> - 7.5.5 Attempt to Resume Playback If Necessary >> >> - 8.3 Support Multiple Keys >> >> >> >> These are a small minority (19 out of 136 requirements analyzed). It has >> not yet been decided which of these gaps need to be addressed in the final >> test plan. >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Francois Daoust [mailto:fd@w3.org] >> Sent: Monday, July 18, 2016 6:16 AM >> To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>; Matt Wolenetz < >> wolenetz@google.com> >> Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com) < >> ddorwin@google.com>; Mark Watson <watsonm@netflix.com>; Jerry Smith >> (WPT) <jdsmith@microsoft.com>; Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org) < >> plh@w3.org>; public-hme-editors@w3.org; Iraj Sodagar <irajs@microsoft.com>; >> John Simmons <johnsim@microsoft.com> >> Subject: Re: [Agenda] HTML Media Extensions WG Editors meeting, Tue Jul 19 >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> I cannot attend the call tomorrow, and will not be around in the next >> couple of weeks. A quick update below: >> >> >> >> On 15/07/2016 04:39, Paul Cotton wrote: >> >> > Thanks for the update, Matt. >> >> > >> >> > Could others provide a short written summary of what you are working on >> and what blockers you think we have or where you need others to help? >> >> >> >> Regarding MSE testing, as shared on the HTML Media mailing-list, things >> are starting to look good. See that email for a list of main missing >> features in implementations: >> >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016Jul/0006.html >> >> >> >> I corrected tests that failed because they incorrectly truncated the >> duration of buffered content, which is no longer allowed. This turned a >> number of cells green. I also imported and converted tests from the >> Chromium test suite. >> >> >> >> New/Corrected MSE tests have not been merged in the Web Platform Tests >> repository yet. They should first be reviewed by someone else (I see Matt >> is planning to do so) to ensure I got things right. List at: >> >> >> https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Amedia-source >> >> >> >> Some edge cases of SourceBuffer algorithms are probably not thoroughly >> tested. That said, the test suite covers main visible effects of these >> algorithms, which I hope is good enough. >> >> >> >> In short: >> >> 1. Outstanding PR on test repo should be reviewed, fixed as needed, and >> merged. >> >> 2. I think the test suite can be viewed as "good enough" after that, >> although it can certainly be improved. >> >> 3. Some features are not yet implemented across browsers. The >> implementation report should be updated once that is done. I'd be happy to >> do that once I am back to work. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Francois. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Sent from my Windows 10 phone >> >> > >> >> > *From: *Matt Wolenetz <mailto:wolenetz@google.com <wolenetz@google.com> >> > >> >> > *Sent: *July 14, 2016 14:58 >> >> > *To: *Paul Cotton <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com >> <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> >> >> > *Cc: *David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com> (ddorwin@google.com) < >> mailto:ddorwin@google.com <ddorwin@google.com>>; Mark Watson < >> mailto:watsonm@netflix.com <watsonm@netflix.com>>; Jerry Smith (WPT) < >> mailto:jdsmith@microsoft.com <jdsmith@microsoft.com>>; Philippe Le >> Hegaret (plh@w3.org) <mailto:plh@w3.org <plh@w3.org>>; Francois Daoust < >> mailto:fd@w3.org <fd@w3.org>>; public-hme-editors@w3.org < >> mailto:public-hme-editors@w3.org <public-hme-editors@w3.org>>; Iraj >> Sodagar <mailto:irajs@microsoft.com <irajs@microsoft.com>>; John Simmons >> <mailto:johnsim@microsoft.com <johnsim@microsoft.com>> >> >> > *Subject: *Re: [Agenda] HTML Media Extensions WG Editors meeting, Tue >> Jul 19 >> >> > >> >> > Acknowledged. I'll attend. >> >> > >> >> > Regarding: https://github.com/w3c/media-source/milestones/V1Editorial, >> I currently have 9 pull requests out for review at >> https://github.com/w3c/media-source/pulls/wolenetz and am working on >> more of those. >> >> > I'm also planning to review outstanding w-p-t PRs and upstreaming more >> tests from Chromium prior to the meeting, in parallel with closing down >> more Chromium MSE spec compatibility issues discovered during testing. >> >> > >> >> > Thanks, >> >> > Matt >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 2:40 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com >> <mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I am scheduling another meeting of the Media Extensions WG MSE and >> EME Editors for Tuesday Jul 19 at 8am PDT during the normal WG/TF meeting >> slot. Meeting location information is given below.____ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > Please let me know if there are any others I should invite to this >> meeting.____ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > __1.__MSE and EME timeline discussion, Paul and Philippe >> >> > >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016May/0029.html >> ____ >> >> > >> >> > Status: The timeline indicates we are planning to do the CfC for >> MSE and EME Proposed Recommendations on Aug 2. ____ >> >> > >> >> > __2.__MSE test suite and testing report status, Francois Daoust >> >> > >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016Jul/0006.html >> >> > http://w3c.github.io/test-results/media-source/complete-fails.html >> ____ >> >> > >> >> > __3.__EME test suite >> >> > >> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-media/2016Jul/0004.html >> ____ >> >> > >> >> > __4.__Schedule for completion of editorial MSE and EME issues >> >> > https://github.com/w3c/media-source/milestones/V1Editorial ____ >> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/w3c/encrypted-media/milestones/V1Editorial ____ >> >> > >> >> > __5.__MSE Registry publication as WG notes, Philippe____ >> >> > >> >> > https://github.com/w3c/media-source/issues/74 ____ >> >> > >> >> > __6.__Any other business____ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > /paulc____ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > Paul Cotton, Microsoft Ca - nada____ >> >> > >> >> > 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3____ >> >> > >> >> > Tel: (425) 705-9596 <tel:%28425%29%20705-9596 >> <%28425%29%20705-9596>> Fax: (425) 936-7329 <tel:%28425%29%20936-7329 >> <%28425%29%20936-7329>>____ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > Meeting information:____ >> >> > >> >> > http://irc.w3.org #html-media____ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > Join WebEx meeting____ >> >> > >> >> > Meeting number: 649 602 452 Meeting password: >> media ____ >> >> > >> >> > ____ >> >> > >> >> > Join by phone ____ >> >> > >> >> > +1-617-324-0000 <tel:%2B1-617-324-0000 <%2B1-617-324-0000>> US >> Toll Number____ >> >> > >> >> > Access code: 649 602 452 ____ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > __ __ >> >> > >> >> > >> > >
Received on Monday, 25 July 2016 19:25:17 UTC