I have never heard of "ORCA: OpeRational ClassificAtion of Drug Interactions". Did we discuss that on any call? If I haven't heard of it--and I worked in this field as a clinician for a while--I doubt that I would want to include that in a proposal. The vote doesn't give us an option for one and two. On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 6:03 AM Boyce, Richard David <rdb20@pitt.edu> wrote: > > Dear PDDI Task Force, > > We have compiled all results from the Qualtrics survey on options to represent seriousness/severity concepts in the min info model. Many thanks to all who participated! Attached please find a powerpoint that provides a summary of the results. The attached PDF has detailed results including all comments. > > The second to last slide in the powerpoint has a proposal that I think makes sense based on the submitted opinions and comments. I have created a poll (one question) so that everyone can register their anonymous vote on the proposal. Please complete the poll within the next 6 days (by 10/4). > > https://survey.zohopublic.com/zs/AHCsfr > > If a majority agrees with the proposal then we will make the change to the W3C Community Group Note and then move for final approval to publish. Otherwise, will send out a doodle for a call to discuss other options. > > -- > > kind regards, > > -Rich > > > -- > Richard D Boyce, PhD > Associate Professor of Biomedical Informatics and Clinical and Translational Science in the Clinical and Translational > Science Institute > Director of the Informatics Core for the Center of Excellence for Natural Product- Drug Interaction Research (NaPDI) > Faculty, Center for Pharmaceutical Policy and Prescribing > Faculty, Geriatric Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Gero-Informatics Research and Training Program > University of Pittsburgh > rdb20@pitt.edu > Office: 412-648-9219 > Twitter: @bhaapghReceived on Friday, 28 September 2018 13:12:41 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:52:59 UTC