- From: Kashyap, Vipul <VKASHYAP1@PARTNERS.ORG>
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:07:40 -0400
- To: <R.Cornet@amc.uva.nl>
- Cc: <public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org>, <public-hcls-coi@w3.org>
> However, what would be possibly even more useful, is if you > are willing to share the conversion methods rather than the > outcome. In this way, people can use the method to create > their own representation of SNOMED CT if they have the > license for the original version. Moreover, they can apply > the method on each new version of SNOMED CT, and comment on / > contribute to the conversion method. I agree with the above completely. In particular, since Snomed-CT is currently represented in Ontylog, which is a poor cousin of OWL, there might be multiple OWL encodings possible for a given Snomed-CT assertion. It would be instructive to see the criteria you chose to make your choices and trade-offs. Cheers, ---Vipul The information transmitted in this electronic communication is intended only for the person or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of or taking of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this information in error, please contact the Compliance HelpLine at 800-856-1983 and properly dispose of this information.
Received on Sunday, 20 July 2008 20:18:19 UTC