Re: Not GRDDL, but GRDDL-like (was Re: GRDDL and OWL/XML)

Bijan Parsia wrote:
> On 13 May 2008, at 15:56, Chimezie Ogbuji wrote:
[...]
>> My opinion: if the transformation property is not executable then we are
>> talking about a "GRDDL-like" mechanism, but not GRDDL itself:

FWIW, I disagree with Chimezie there as well. That's reading
more into the GRDDL spec than is there.

 > Proper specs *cannot*
> require people to interview members of the community to determine what 
> conforming behavior is. That defeats the point!

Quite.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/

Received on Monday, 19 May 2008 16:01:54 UTC